actix/actix-web vs tokio-rs/axum
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, actix-web and axum both show healthy maintenance signals. actix-web was committed to 4 weeks ago with 8+ active contributors, while axum last saw a commit 1 month ago with 42+ active contributors. actix-web is Apache-2.0-licensed while axum is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
actix/actix-web
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 60% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
tokio-rs/axum
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓42+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 16% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| actix-web | axum | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 24,789 | 26,922 |
| Last commit | 28d ago | 1mo ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 194 | 75 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 39% | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? actix/actix-web · tokio-rs/axum
Ask AI about actix/actix-web vs tokio-rs/axum
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.