adamcooke/staytus vs suse/portus
suse/portus shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, portus shows healthier maintenance signals than staytus. portus rates Healthy overall while staytus rates Mixed. staytus last saw a commit 3 years ago with 22+ active contributors, while portus last saw a commit 3 years ago with 6+ active contributors. staytus is MIT-licensed while portus is Apache-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
adamcooke/staytus →
Stale — last commit 3y ago
last commit was 3y ago; no CI workflows detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 3y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 3y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 51% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓22+ active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
suse/portus →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 3y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 71% of recent commits
- ✓6 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| staytus | portus | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 2,178 | 2,986 |
| Last commit | 3y ago | 3y ago |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 61 | 155 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 1% | 1% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? adamcooke/staytus · suse/portus
Ask AI about adamcooke/staytus vs suse/portus
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.