affaan-m/ecc vs pomber/git-history
affaan-m/ecc shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, ecc shows healthier maintenance signals than git-history. ecc rates Healthy overall while git-history rates Mixed. ecc was committed to 1 day ago with 33+ active contributors, while git-history last saw a commit 1 year ago with 7+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
affaan-m/ecc →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 2d ago
- ✓33+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 38% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
pomber/git-history →
Stale — last commit 2y ago
last commit was 2y ago; top contributor handles 91% of recent commits
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 91% of recent commits
- ✓7 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| ecc | git-history | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 222,494 | 13,687 |
| Last commit | 1d ago | 1y ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 94 | 94 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 9% | 9% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? affaan-m/ecc · pomber/git-history
Ask AI about affaan-m/ecc vs pomber/git-history
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.