affaan-m/everything-claude-code vs librespeed/speedtest
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, everything-claude-code and speedtest both show healthy maintenance signals. everything-claude-code was committed to 1 week ago with 15+ active contributors, while speedtest last saw a commit 1 month ago with 13+ active contributors. everything-claude-code is MIT-licensed while speedtest is LGPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
affaan-m/everything-claude-code
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 61% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓15 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
librespeed/speedtest
Strong maintenance signals
copyleft license (LGPL-3.0) — review compatibility
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10
- ⚠LGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 2w ago
- ✓13 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 37% of recent commits)
- ✓LGPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| everything-claude-code | speedtest | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 255,278 | 15,108 |
| Last commit | 7d ago | 1mo ago |
| License | MIT | LGPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 183 | 12 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 78% | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | A | C |
| Cycles | 0 | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? affaan-m/everything-claude-code · librespeed/speedtest
Ask AI about affaan-m/everything-claude-code vs librespeed/speedtest
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.