affaan-m/everything-claude-code vs piebald-ai/claude-code-system-prompts
affaan-m/everything-claude-code shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, everything-claude-code shows healthier maintenance signals than claude-code-system-prompts. everything-claude-code rates Healthy overall while claude-code-system-prompts rates Mixed. everything-claude-code was committed to 1 week ago with 15+ active contributors, while claude-code-system-prompts was committed to 6 days ago with 2+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
affaan-m/everything-claude-code
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 61% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓15 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
piebald-ai/claude-code-system-prompts
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
top contributor handles 99% of recent commits; no CI workflows detected…
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no CI workflows detected; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 99% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓2 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Mixed to Healthy if: diversify commit ownership (top <90%)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| everything-claude-code | claude-code-system-prompts | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 255,278 | 12,646 |
| Last commit | 7d ago | 6d ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 183 | 8 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | No |
| Test coverage | 78% | 50% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | A | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? affaan-m/everything-claude-code · piebald-ai/claude-code-system-prompts
Ask AI about affaan-m/everything-claude-code vs piebald-ai/claude-code-system-prompts
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.