RepoPilot

airbnb/ruby vs mame/quine-relay

airbnb/ruby shows stronger signals overall

As of June 2026, ruby shows healthier maintenance signals than quine-relay. ruby rates Healthy overall while quine-relay rates Mixed. ruby last saw a commit 6 months ago with 24+ active contributors, while quine-relay last saw a commit 8 months ago with 10+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

airbnb/ruby

Healthy

Healthy across all four use cases

HealthyDependency

Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Slowing — last commit 5mo ago
  • Last commit 5mo ago
  • 24+ active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 25% of recent commits)
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

mame/quine-relay

Mixed

Slowing — last commit 7mo ago

ConcernsDependency

no license — legally unclear

ConcernsFork & modify

no license — can't legally use code

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

ConcernsDeploy as-is

no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 7mo ago

  • Slowing — last commit 7mo ago
  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 84% of recent commits
  • No license — legally unclear to depend on
  • Last commit 7mo ago
  • 10 active contributors
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
  • Fork & modify ConcernsMixed if: add a LICENSE file
  • Deploy as-is ConcernsMixed if: add a LICENSE file

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

Signal-by-signal breakdown

rubyquine-relay
Stars3,89414,476
Last commit6mo ago8mo ago
LicenseMIT
Open issues1517
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage100%3%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineHealthy signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? airbnb/ruby · mame/quine-relay

Ask AI about airbnb/ruby vs mame/quine-relay

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.