alibaba/datax vs halo-dev/halo
halo-dev/halo shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, halo shows healthier maintenance signals than datax. halo rates Healthy overall while datax rates Mixed. datax last saw a commit 12 months ago with 25+ active contributors, while halo last saw a commit 1 month ago with 11+ active contributors. datax is Other-licensed while halo is GPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
alibaba/datax →
Slowing — last commit 10mo ago
non-standard license (Other); no CI workflows detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 10mo ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10…
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 10mo ago
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 10mo ago
- ✓25+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 16% of recent commits)
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days; bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
halo-dev/halo →
Healthy across the board
copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓11 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 44% of recent commits)
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| datax | halo | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 17,197 | 38,498 |
| Last commit | 12mo ago | 1mo ago |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 1,357 | 189 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 18% | 11% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? alibaba/datax · halo-dev/halo
Ask AI about alibaba/datax vs halo-dev/halo
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.