alpinejs/alpine vs sjmoran/sjmoran.github.io
alpinejs/alpine shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, alpine shows healthier maintenance signals than sjmoran.github.io. alpine rates Healthy overall while sjmoran.github.io rates Mixed. alpine was committed to today with 24+ active contributors, while sjmoran.github.io was committed to today with 1+ active contributor. alpine is MIT-licensed while sjmoran.github.io is CC0-1.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
alpinejs/alpine →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓24+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 49% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
sjmoran/sjmoran.github.io →
Solo project — review before adopting
single-maintainer (no co-maintainers visible); no tests detected…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓CC0-1.0 licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: onboard a second core maintainer; add a test suite
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| alpine | sjmoran.github.io | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 31,707 | 1 |
| Last commit | today | today |
| License | MIT | CC0-1.0 |
| Open issues | 2 | 0 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 69% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | C |
| Cycles | — | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? alpinejs/alpine · sjmoran/sjmoran.github.io
Ask AI about alpinejs/alpine vs sjmoran/sjmoran.github.io
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.