RepoPilot

amitshekhariitbhu/rxjava2-android-samples vs yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro

yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro shows stronger signals overall

As of June 2026, ruoyi-vue-pro shows healthier maintenance signals than rxjava2-android-samples. ruoyi-vue-pro rates Healthy overall while rxjava2-android-samples rates Mixed. rxjava2-android-samples last saw a commit 5 months ago with 14+ active contributors, while ruoyi-vue-pro last saw a commit 1 month ago with 5+ active contributors. rxjava2-android-samples is Apache-2.0-licensed while ruoyi-vue-pro is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

amitshekhariitbhu/rxjava2-android-samples

Mixed

Slowing — last commit 3mo ago

HealthyDependency

Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; no CI workflows detected

  • Slowing — last commit 3mo ago
  • Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 78% of recent commits
  • No CI workflows detected
  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Last commit 3mo ago
  • 14 active contributors
  • Apache-2.0 licensed
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Deploy as-is MixedHealthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro

Healthy

Healthy across all four use cases

HealthyDependency

Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 93% of recent commits
  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Last commit 1d ago
  • 5 active contributors
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

rxjava2-android-samplesruoyi-vue-pro
Stars4,91937,021
Last commit5mo ago1mo ago
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
Open issues173
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage12%32%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineMixed signalsHealthy signals

Want the full analysis? amitshekhariitbhu/rxjava2-android-samples · yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro

Ask AI about amitshekhariitbhu/rxjava2-android-samples vs yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.