amlcurran/showcaseview vs blankj/androidutilcode
blankj/androidutilcode shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, androidutilcode shows healthier maintenance signals than showcaseview. androidutilcode rates Healthy overall while showcaseview rates Concerns. showcaseview last saw a commit 8 years ago with 9+ active contributors, while androidutilcode last saw a commit 1 year ago with 18+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
amlcurran/showcaseview →
Stale and unlicensed — last commit 8y ago
no license — legally unclear; last commit was 8y ago…
no license — can't legally use code; no tests detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 8y ago…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 8y ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 84% of recent commits
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓9 active contributors
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
blankj/androidutilcode →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 58% of recent commits
- ✓18 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| showcaseview | androidutilcode | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 5,556 | 33,678 |
| Last commit | 8y ago | 1y ago |
| License | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 95 | 328 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 21% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Concerns signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? amlcurran/showcaseview · blankj/androidutilcode
Ask AI about amlcurran/showcaseview vs blankj/androidutilcode
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.