andreamazz/amscrollingnavbar vs p0deje/maccy
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, amscrollingnavbar and maccy both show mixed maintenance signals. amscrollingnavbar last saw a commit 3 years ago with 12+ active contributors, while maccy was committed to 1 week ago with 26+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
andreamazz/amscrollingnavbar
Stale — last commit 3y ago
last commit was 3y ago; no tests detected in the complete Git tree…
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 3y ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 3y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 74% of recent commits
- ⚠No tests detected in the complete Git tree
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓12 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
p0deje/maccy
Mixed signals — read the receipts
no tests detected in the complete Git tree; no CI workflows detected…
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; no CI workflows detected…
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No tests detected in the complete Git tree
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 2d ago
- ✓26+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 35% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Mixed to Healthy if: add a test suite
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| amscrollingnavbar | maccy | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 5,995 | 21,493 |
| Last commit | 3y ago | 12d ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 39 | 167 |
| Has tests | No | No |
| Has CI | ✓ | No |
| Test coverage | 0% | — |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | C |
| Cycles | 0 | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? andreamazz/amscrollingnavbar · p0deje/maccy
Ask AI about andreamazz/amscrollingnavbar vs p0deje/maccy
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.