angular/angular.js vs sindresorhus/get-port
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, angular.js and get-port both show mixed maintenance signals. angular.js last saw a commit 2 years ago with 21+ active contributors, while get-port last saw a commit 5 months ago with 21+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
angular/angular.js
Stale — last commit 2y ago
last commit was 2y ago; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 2y ago; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ✓21+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 32% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
sindresorhus/get-port
Slowing — last commit 6mo ago
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 6mo ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 69% of recent commits
- ⚠No tests detected in the complete Git tree
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 6mo ago
- ✓21+ active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| angular.js | get-port | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 58,532 | 929 |
| Last commit | 2y ago | 5mo ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 461 | 1 |
| Has tests | ✓ | No |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 20% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | A | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? angular/angular.js · sindresorhus/get-port
Ask AI about angular/angular.js vs sindresorhus/get-port
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.