anomalyco/opencode vs drizzle-team/drizzle-orm
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, opencode and drizzle-orm both show healthy maintenance signals. opencode was committed to 2 days ago with 22+ active contributors, while drizzle-orm was committed to 1 week ago with 17+ active contributors. opencode is MIT-licensed while drizzle-orm is Apache-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
anomalyco/opencode
Strong maintenance signals
dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; 1 cyclic import chain detected…
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓22+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 31% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
drizzle-team/drizzle-orm
Strong maintenance signals
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; 8 cyclic import chains — pervasive coupling
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 2d ago
- ✓17 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 24% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| opencode | drizzle-orm | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 206,201 | 35,700 |
| Last commit | 2d ago | 7d ago |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 5,711 | 2,010 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 42% | 38% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | A | C |
| Cycles | 1 | 8 |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? anomalyco/opencode · drizzle-team/drizzle-orm
Ask AI about anomalyco/opencode vs drizzle-team/drizzle-orm
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.