anomalyco/opencode vs jestjs/jest
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, opencode and jest both show healthy maintenance signals. opencode was committed to 2 days ago with 22+ active contributors, while jest was committed to 3 weeks ago with 24+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
anomalyco/opencode
Strong maintenance signals
dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; 1 cyclic import chain detected…
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓22+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 31% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
jestjs/jest
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 53% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓24+ active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| opencode | jest | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 206,201 | 45,468 |
| Last commit | 2d ago | 23d ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 5,711 | 179 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 42% | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | A | — |
| Cycles | 1 | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? anomalyco/opencode · jestjs/jest
Ask AI about anomalyco/opencode vs jestjs/jest
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.