anomalyco/opencode vs pmndrs/zustand
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, opencode and zustand both show healthy maintenance signals. opencode was committed to today with 18+ active contributors, while zustand was committed to 5 days ago with 36+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
anomalyco/opencode →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓18 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 38% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
pmndrs/zustand →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 5d ago
- ✓36+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 24% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| opencode | zustand | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 179,594 | 58,405 |
| Last commit | today | 5d ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 7,023 | 5 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 1% | 67% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? anomalyco/opencode · pmndrs/zustand
Ask AI about anomalyco/opencode vs pmndrs/zustand
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.