anomalyco/opencode vs practical-tutorials/project-based-learning
anomalyco/opencode shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, opencode shows healthier maintenance signals than project-based-learning. opencode rates Healthy overall while project-based-learning rates Mixed. opencode was committed to 2 days ago with 22+ active contributors, while project-based-learning last saw a commit 2 months ago with 37+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
anomalyco/opencode
Strong maintenance signals
dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; 1 cyclic import chain detected…
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓22+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 31% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
practical-tutorials/project-based-learning
Evidence incomplete — review before adopting
test evidence incomplete; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ⚠Could not verify tests from the available repository evidence
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓37+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 42% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| opencode | project-based-learning | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 206,201 | 271,965 |
| Last commit | 2d ago | 2mo ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 5,711 | 291 |
| Has tests | ✓ | Unknown |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 42% | — |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | A | — |
| Cycles | 1 | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? anomalyco/opencode · practical-tutorials/project-based-learning
Ask AI about anomalyco/opencode vs practical-tutorials/project-based-learning
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.