RepoPilot

anomalyco/opencode vs vitejs/vite

Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health

As of September 2026, opencode and vite both show healthy maintenance signals. opencode was committed to today with 21+ active contributors, while vite was committed to 1 week ago with 28+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

anomalyco/opencode

Healthy

Strong maintenance signals

MixedDependency

dependency CVE scan unavailable

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; 1 cyclic import chain detected…

  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Last commit today
  • 21+ active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 33% of recent commits)
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

vitejs/vite

Healthy

Healthy across all four use cases

HealthyDependency

No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.

  • Used by 3 trusted projects: nuxt/nuxt, withastro/astro, vitest-dev/vitest
  • Last commit 1d ago
  • 28+ active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 32% of recent commits)
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

opencodevite
Stars207,95782,724
Last committoday11d ago
LicenseMITMIT
Open issues5,799761
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage42%45%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture gradeAC
Cycles18
Bottom-lineHealthy signalsHealthy signals

Want the full analysis? anomalyco/opencode · vitejs/vite

Ask AI about anomalyco/opencode vs vitejs/vite

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.