apolloauto/apollo vs interpretml/interpret
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, apollo and interpret both show healthy maintenance signals. apollo last saw a commit 2 months ago with 24+ active contributors, while interpret last saw a commit 1 month ago with 6+ active contributors. apollo is Apache-2.0-licensed while interpret is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
apolloauto/apollo →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 4w ago
- ✓24+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 35% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
interpretml/interpret →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 93% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 2d ago
- ✓6 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| apollo | interpret | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 26,609 | 6,847 |
| Last commit | 2mo ago | 1mo ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 1,028 | 111 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 60% | 47% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? apolloauto/apollo · interpretml/interpret
Ask AI about apolloauto/apollo vs interpretml/interpret
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.