apolloauto/apollo vs wuye9036/cpptemplatetutorial
apolloauto/apollo shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, apollo shows healthier maintenance signals than cpptemplatetutorial. apollo rates Healthy overall while cpptemplatetutorial rates Concerns. apollo last saw a commit 2 months ago with 24+ active contributors, while cpptemplatetutorial last saw a commit 1 year ago with 21+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
apolloauto/apollo →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 4w ago
- ✓24+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 35% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
wuye9036/cpptemplatetutorial →
Stale and unlicensed — last commit 2y ago
no license — legally unclear; last commit was 2y ago…
no license — can't legally use code; no tests detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 2y ago…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 61% of recent commits
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓21+ active contributors
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| apollo | cpptemplatetutorial | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 26,609 | 10,538 |
| Last commit | 2mo ago | 1y ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Open issues | 1,028 | 18 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | — | — |
| Test coverage | 60% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Concerns signals |
Want the full analysis? apolloauto/apollo · wuye9036/cpptemplatetutorial
Ask AI about apolloauto/apollo vs wuye9036/cpptemplatetutorial
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.