apollographql/apollo-server vs graphile/postgraphile
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, apollo-server and postgraphile both show healthy maintenance signals. apollo-server was committed to 3 weeks ago with 18+ active contributors, while postgraphile last saw a commit 1 month ago with 5+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
apollographql/apollo-server
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (2/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓18 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 37% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
graphile/postgraphile
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 86% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 6d ago
- ✓5 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| apollo-server | postgraphile | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 13,945 | 12,930 |
| Last commit | 25d ago | 1mo ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 88 | 163 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 49% | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? apollographql/apollo-server · graphile/postgraphile
Ask AI about apollographql/apollo-server vs graphile/postgraphile
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.