arbox/machine-learning-with-ruby vs basecamp/kamal
basecamp/kamal shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, kamal shows healthier maintenance signals than machine-learning-with-ruby. kamal rates Healthy overall while machine-learning-with-ruby rates Mixed. machine-learning-with-ruby last saw a commit 1 year ago with 16+ active contributors, while kamal last saw a commit 1 month ago with 14+ active contributors. machine-learning-with-ruby is CC0-1.0-licensed while kamal is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
arbox/machine-learning-with-ruby →
Stale — last commit 1y ago
last commit was 1y ago; no tests detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 1y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 66% of recent commits
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓16 active contributors
- ✓CC0-1.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
basecamp/kamal →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 80% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 2w ago
- ✓14 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| machine-learning-with-ruby | kamal | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 2,212 | 14,194 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | 1mo ago |
| License | CC0-1.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 6 | 143 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | — | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? arbox/machine-learning-with-ruby · basecamp/kamal
Ask AI about arbox/machine-learning-with-ruby vs basecamp/kamal
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.