arbox/machine-learning-with-ruby vs mame/quine-relay
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, machine-learning-with-ruby and quine-relay both show mixed maintenance signals. machine-learning-with-ruby last saw a commit 1 year ago with 16+ active contributors, while quine-relay last saw a commit 8 months ago with 10+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
arbox/machine-learning-with-ruby →
Stale — last commit 1y ago
last commit was 1y ago; no tests detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 1y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 66% of recent commits
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓16 active contributors
- ✓CC0-1.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
mame/quine-relay →
Slowing — last commit 7mo ago
no license — legally unclear
no license — can't legally use code
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 7mo ago
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 7mo ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 84% of recent commits
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ✓Last commit 7mo ago
- ✓10 active contributors
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| machine-learning-with-ruby | quine-relay | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 2,212 | 14,476 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | 8mo ago |
| License | CC0-1.0 | — |
| Open issues | 6 | 17 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | — | 3% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? arbox/machine-learning-with-ruby · mame/quine-relay
Ask AI about arbox/machine-learning-with-ruby vs mame/quine-relay
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.