aspnet/mvc vs huiyadanli/revokemsgpatcher
aspnet/mvc shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, mvc shows healthier maintenance signals than revokemsgpatcher. mvc rates Healthy overall while revokemsgpatcher rates Mixed. mvc last saw a commit 7 years ago with 13+ active contributors, while revokemsgpatcher last saw a commit 1 month ago with 5+ active contributors. mvc is Apache-2.0-licensed while revokemsgpatcher is GPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
aspnet/mvc →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 7y ago
- ✓13 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 37% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
huiyadanli/revokemsgpatcher →
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; top contributor handles 94% of recent commits…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 94% of recent commits
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 3d ago
- ✓5 active contributors
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| mvc | revokemsgpatcher | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 5,580 | 37,597 |
| Last commit | 7y ago | 1mo ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 0 | 51 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? aspnet/mvc · huiyadanli/revokemsgpatcher
Ask AI about aspnet/mvc vs huiyadanli/revokemsgpatcher
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.