astral-sh/ruff vs autozimu/languageclient-neovim
astral-sh/ruff shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, ruff shows healthier maintenance signals than languageclient-neovim. ruff rates Healthy overall while languageclient-neovim rates Mixed. ruff was committed to today with 21+ active contributors, while languageclient-neovim last saw a commit 8 months ago with 18+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
astral-sh/ruff →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓21+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 35% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
autozimu/languageclient-neovim →
Slowing — last commit 8mo ago
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 8mo ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 8mo ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 60% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 8mo ago
- ✓18 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| ruff | languageclient-neovim | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 48,249 | 3,554 |
| Last commit | today | 8mo ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 2,036 | 124 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? astral-sh/ruff · autozimu/languageclient-neovim
Ask AI about astral-sh/ruff vs autozimu/languageclient-neovim
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.