astral-sh/ruff vs erebe/wstunnel
astral-sh/ruff shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, ruff shows healthier maintenance signals than wstunnel. ruff rates Healthy overall while wstunnel rates Mixed. ruff was committed to 1 week ago with 22+ active contributors, while wstunnel last saw a commit 4 months ago with 8+ active contributors. ruff is MIT-licensed while wstunnel is BSD-3-Clause-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
astral-sh/ruff
Strong maintenance signals
dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓22+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 26% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
erebe/wstunnel
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
top contributor handles 90% of recent commits; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 90% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 3d ago
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓BSD-3-Clause licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| ruff | wstunnel | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 49,540 | 6,665 |
| Last commit | 9d ago | 4mo ago |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Open issues | 2,174 | 31 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | 2% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | B | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? astral-sh/ruff · erebe/wstunnel
Ask AI about astral-sh/ruff vs erebe/wstunnel
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.