astral-sh/ruff vs frectonz/sql-studio
astral-sh/ruff shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, ruff shows healthier maintenance signals than sql-studio. ruff rates Healthy overall while sql-studio rates Mixed. ruff was committed to today with 21+ active contributors, while sql-studio last saw a commit 3 months ago with 4+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
astral-sh/ruff →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓21+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 35% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
frectonz/sql-studio →
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
top contributor handles 97% of recent commits; no tests detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 97% of recent commits
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 8w ago
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: diversify commit ownership (top <90%)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| ruff | sql-studio | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 48,249 | 3,538 |
| Last commit | today | 3mo ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 2,036 | 1 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? astral-sh/ruff · frectonz/sql-studio
Ask AI about astral-sh/ruff vs frectonz/sql-studio
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.