astral-sh/ruff vs guillaumegomez/sysinfo
astral-sh/ruff shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, ruff shows healthier maintenance signals than sysinfo. ruff rates Healthy overall while sysinfo rates Mixed. ruff was committed to today with 21+ active contributors, while sysinfo was committed to 2 days ago with 10+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
astral-sh/ruff →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓21+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 35% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
guillaumegomez/sysinfo →
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; 3 cyclic import chains — pervasive coupling
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 82% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓10 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| ruff | sysinfo | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 48,249 | 2,712 |
| Last commit | today | 2d ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 2,036 | 60 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | 19% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | B |
| Cycles | — | 3 |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? astral-sh/ruff · guillaumegomez/sysinfo
Ask AI about astral-sh/ruff vs guillaumegomez/sysinfo
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.