RepoPilot

astral-sh/ruff vs ilya-zlobintsev/lact

Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health

As of September 2026, ruff and lact both show healthy maintenance signals. ruff was committed to 1 week ago with 22+ active contributors, while lact last saw a commit 1 month ago with 12+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

astral-sh/ruff

Healthy

Strong maintenance signals

MixedDependency

dependency CVE scan unavailable

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable

  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Last commit today
  • 22+ active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 26% of recent commits)
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

ilya-zlobintsev/lact

Healthy

Healthy across all four use cases

HealthyDependency

No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.

  • Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 60% of recent commits
  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Last commit 2d ago
  • 12 active contributors
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

rufflact
Stars49,5405,421
Last commit9d ago1mo ago
LicenseMITMIT
Open issues2,17491
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage100%100%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture gradeBA
Cycles00
Bottom-lineHealthy signalsHealthy signals

Want the full analysis? astral-sh/ruff · ilya-zlobintsev/lact

Ask AI about astral-sh/ruff vs ilya-zlobintsev/lact

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.