astral-sh/ruff vs ogham/dog
astral-sh/ruff shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, ruff shows healthier maintenance signals than dog. ruff rates Healthy overall while dog rates Mixed. ruff was committed to today with 21+ active contributors, while dog last saw a commit 2 years ago with 17+ active contributors. ruff is MIT-licensed while dog is EUPL-1.2-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
astral-sh/ruff →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓21+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 35% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
ogham/dog →
Stale — last commit 2y ago
non-standard license (EUPL-1.2); last commit was 2y ago
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 2y ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 82% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (EUPL-1.2) — review terms
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓17 active contributors
- ✓EUPL-1.2 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| ruff | dog | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 48,249 | 6,650 |
| Last commit | today | 2y ago |
| License | MIT | EUPL-1.2 |
| Open issues | 2,036 | 80 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | 6% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? astral-sh/ruff · ogham/dog
Ask AI about astral-sh/ruff vs ogham/dog
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.