RepoPilot

astral-sh/ruff vs r-darwish/topgrade

astral-sh/ruff shows stronger signals overall

As of June 2026, ruff shows healthier maintenance signals than topgrade. ruff rates Healthy overall while topgrade rates Mixed. ruff was committed to today with 21+ active contributors, while topgrade last saw a commit 3 years ago with 25+ active contributors. ruff is MIT-licensed while topgrade is GPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

astral-sh/ruff

Healthy

Healthy across the board

HealthyDependency

Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Last commit today
  • 21+ active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 35% of recent commits)
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

r-darwish/topgrade

Mixed

Stale — last commit 4y ago

ConcernsDependency

copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; last commit was 4y ago…

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Stale — last commit 4y ago
  • Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 66% of recent commits
  • GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
  • No test directory detected
  • 25+ active contributors
  • GPL-3.0 licensed
  • CI configured

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

Signal-by-signal breakdown

rufftopgrade
Stars48,2493,304
Last committoday3y ago
LicenseMITGPL-3.0
Open issues2,03666
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage100%0%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineHealthy signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? astral-sh/ruff · r-darwish/topgrade

Ask AI about astral-sh/ruff vs r-darwish/topgrade

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.