astral-sh/ruff vs redox-os/orbtk
astral-sh/ruff shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, ruff shows healthier maintenance signals than orbtk. ruff rates Healthy overall while orbtk rates Mixed. ruff was committed to today with 21+ active contributors, while orbtk last saw a commit 3 years ago with 6+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
astral-sh/ruff →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓21+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 35% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
redox-os/orbtk →
Stale — last commit 4y ago
last commit was 4y ago; no tests detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 4y ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 4y ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 81% of recent commits
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓6 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days; bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| ruff | orbtk | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 48,249 | 3,783 |
| Last commit | today | 3y ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 2,036 | 87 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? astral-sh/ruff · redox-os/orbtk
Ask AI about astral-sh/ruff vs redox-os/orbtk
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.