astral-sh/ruff vs speykious/cve-rs
astral-sh/ruff shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, ruff shows healthier maintenance signals than cve-rs. ruff rates Healthy overall while cve-rs rates Mixed. ruff was committed to today with 21+ active contributors, while cve-rs last saw a commit 9 months ago with 9+ active contributors. ruff is MIT-licensed while cve-rs is Other-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
astral-sh/ruff →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓21+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 35% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
speykious/cve-rs →
Slowing — last commit 7mo ago
non-standard license (Other); no tests detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 7mo ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 53% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 7mo ago
- ✓9 active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| ruff | cve-rs | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 48,249 | 5,368 |
| Last commit | today | 9mo ago |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Open issues | 2,036 | 24 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? astral-sh/ruff · speykious/cve-rs
Ask AI about astral-sh/ruff vs speykious/cve-rs
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.