astral-sh/ruff vs watchexec/cargo-watch
astral-sh/ruff shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, ruff shows healthier maintenance signals than cargo-watch. ruff rates Healthy overall while cargo-watch rates Mixed. ruff was committed to 1 week ago with 22+ active contributors, while cargo-watch last saw a commit 1 year ago with 10+ active contributors. ruff is MIT-licensed while cargo-watch is CC0-1.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
astral-sh/ruff
Strong maintenance signals
dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓22+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 26% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
watchexec/cargo-watch
Stale — last commit 1y ago
last commit was 1y ago; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 1y ago; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Stale — last commit 1y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 78% of recent commits
- ✓10 active contributors
- ✓CC0-1.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| ruff | cargo-watch | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 49,540 | 2,862 |
| Last commit | 9d ago | 1y ago |
| License | MIT | CC0-1.0 |
| Open issues | 2,174 | 33 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | B | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? astral-sh/ruff · watchexec/cargo-watch
Ask AI about astral-sh/ruff vs watchexec/cargo-watch
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.