babylonjs/babylon.js vs pmndrs/react-three-fiber
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, babylon.js and react-three-fiber both show healthy maintenance signals. babylon.js was committed to 2 weeks ago with 15+ active contributors, while react-three-fiber was committed to 2 weeks ago with 19+ active contributors. babylon.js is Apache-2.0-licensed while react-three-fiber is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
babylonjs/babylon.js
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓15 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 36% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
pmndrs/react-three-fiber
Strong maintenance signals
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓19 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 46% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| babylon.js | react-three-fiber | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 25,990 | 31,812 |
| Last commit | 20d ago | 20d ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 17 | 50 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 29% | 25% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? babylonjs/babylon.js · pmndrs/react-three-fiber
Ask AI about babylonjs/babylon.js vs pmndrs/react-three-fiber
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.