baomidou/dynamic-datasource vs lmax-exchange/disruptor
baomidou/dynamic-datasource shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, dynamic-datasource shows healthier maintenance signals than disruptor. dynamic-datasource rates Healthy overall while disruptor rates Mixed. dynamic-datasource last saw a commit 4 months ago with 22+ active contributors, while disruptor last saw a commit 1 year ago with 14+ active contributors. Both use the Apache-2.0 license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
baomidou/dynamic-datasource
Strong maintenance signals
dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 54% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 1w ago
- ✓22+ active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
lmax-exchange/disruptor
Stale — last commit 1y ago
last commit was 1y ago; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 1y ago; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Stale — last commit 1y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 61% of recent commits
- ✓14 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| dynamic-datasource | disruptor | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 5,164 | 18,326 |
| Last commit | 4mo ago | 1y ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 4 | 17 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 36% | 41% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? baomidou/dynamic-datasource · lmax-exchange/disruptor
Ask AI about baomidou/dynamic-datasource vs lmax-exchange/disruptor
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.