baomidou/mybatis-plus vs killme2008/aviatorscript
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, mybatis-plus and aviatorscript both show mixed maintenance signals. mybatis-plus was committed to today with 12+ active contributors, while aviatorscript last saw a commit 3 months ago with 8+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
baomidou/mybatis-plus →
OpenSSF Scorecard says this is unmaintained
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 71% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓12 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
killme2008/aviatorscript →
Missing license — unclear to depend on
no license — legally unclear; top contributor handles 90% of recent commits
no license — can't legally use code
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 90% of recent commits
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ✓Last commit 2mo ago
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| mybatis-plus | aviatorscript | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 17,401 | 5,194 |
| Last commit | today | 3mo ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Open issues | 115 | 79 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 36% | 64% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? baomidou/mybatis-plus · killme2008/aviatorscript
Ask AI about baomidou/mybatis-plus vs killme2008/aviatorscript
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.