RepoPilot

baomidou/mybatis-plus vs yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro

yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro shows stronger signals overall

As of June 2026, ruoyi-vue-pro shows healthier maintenance signals than mybatis-plus. ruoyi-vue-pro rates Healthy overall while mybatis-plus rates Mixed. mybatis-plus was committed to today with 12+ active contributors, while ruoyi-vue-pro last saw a commit 1 month ago with 5+ active contributors. mybatis-plus is Apache-2.0-licensed while ruoyi-vue-pro is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

baomidou/mybatis-plus

Mixed

OpenSSF Scorecard says this is unmaintained

HealthyDependency

Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10

  • Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 71% of recent commits
  • Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Last commit today
  • 12 active contributors
  • Apache-2.0 licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Deploy as-is MixedHealthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro

Healthy

Healthy across all four use cases

HealthyDependency

Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 93% of recent commits
  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Last commit 1d ago
  • 5 active contributors
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

mybatis-plusruoyi-vue-pro
Stars17,40137,021
Last committoday1mo ago
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
Open issues1153
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage36%32%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture gradeC
Cycles0
Bottom-lineMixed signalsHealthy signals

Want the full analysis? baomidou/mybatis-plus · yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro

Ask AI about baomidou/mybatis-plus vs yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.