barry-ran/qtscrcpy vs cxasm/notepad--
barry-ran/qtscrcpy shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, qtscrcpy shows healthier maintenance signals than notepad--. qtscrcpy rates Healthy overall while notepad-- rates Mixed. qtscrcpy last saw a commit 2 months ago with 15+ active contributors, while notepad-- last saw a commit 2 months ago with 4+ active contributors. qtscrcpy is Apache-2.0-licensed while notepad-- is GPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
barry-ran/qtscrcpy →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 5w ago
- ✓15 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 47% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
cxasm/notepad-- →
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; no tests detected…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 89% of recent commits
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 4w ago
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| qtscrcpy | notepad-- | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 29,419 | 9,434 |
| Last commit | 2mo ago | 2mo ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 602 | 279 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 5% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? barry-ran/qtscrcpy · cxasm/notepad--
Ask AI about barry-ran/qtscrcpy vs cxasm/notepad--
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.