barry-ran/qtscrcpy vs lltcggie/waifu2x-caffe
barry-ran/qtscrcpy shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, qtscrcpy shows healthier maintenance signals than waifu2x-caffe. qtscrcpy rates Healthy overall while waifu2x-caffe rates Mixed. qtscrcpy last saw a commit 2 months ago with 15+ active contributors, while waifu2x-caffe last saw a commit 3 months ago with 11+ active contributors. qtscrcpy is Apache-2.0-licensed while waifu2x-caffe is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
barry-ran/qtscrcpy →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 5w ago
- ✓15 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 47% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
lltcggie/waifu2x-caffe →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
no tests detected; no CI workflows detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 68% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 6w ago
- ✓11 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: add a test suite
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| qtscrcpy | waifu2x-caffe | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 29,419 | 8,226 |
| Last commit | 2mo ago | 3mo ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 602 | 92 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 5% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? barry-ran/qtscrcpy · lltcggie/waifu2x-caffe
Ask AI about barry-ran/qtscrcpy vs lltcggie/waifu2x-caffe
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.