barry-ran/qtscrcpy vs quipnetwork/cpp-sdk
barry-ran/qtscrcpy shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, qtscrcpy shows healthier maintenance signals than cpp-sdk. qtscrcpy rates Healthy overall while cpp-sdk rates Mixed. qtscrcpy last saw a commit 2 months ago with 15+ active contributors, while cpp-sdk last saw a commit 11 months ago with 1+ active contributor. qtscrcpy is Apache-2.0-licensed while cpp-sdk is AGPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
barry-ran/qtscrcpy →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 5w ago
- ✓15 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 47% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
quipnetwork/cpp-sdk →
Slowing — last commit 10mo ago
copyleft license (AGPL-3.0) — review compatibility; single-maintainer (no co-maintainers visible)…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 10mo ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 10mo ago
- ⚠Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
- ⚠AGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓Last commit 10mo ago
- ✓AGPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| qtscrcpy | cpp-sdk | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 29,419 | 11,635 |
| Last commit | 2mo ago | 11mo ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 602 | 3 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 5% | 80% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? barry-ran/qtscrcpy · quipnetwork/cpp-sdk
Ask AI about barry-ran/qtscrcpy vs quipnetwork/cpp-sdk
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.