barry-ran/qtscrcpy vs redpanda-data/redpanda
barry-ran/qtscrcpy shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, qtscrcpy shows healthier maintenance signals than redpanda. qtscrcpy rates Healthy overall while redpanda rates Mixed. qtscrcpy last saw a commit 2 months ago with 15+ active contributors, while redpanda last saw a commit 1 month ago with 14+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
barry-ran/qtscrcpy →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 5w ago
- ✓15 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 47% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
redpanda-data/redpanda →
Missing license — unclear to depend on
no license — legally unclear
no license — can't legally use code
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓14 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 22% of recent commits)
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| qtscrcpy | redpanda | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 29,419 | 12,064 |
| Last commit | 2mo ago | 1mo ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Open issues | 602 | 684 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 5% | 4% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? barry-ran/qtscrcpy · redpanda-data/redpanda
Ask AI about barry-ran/qtscrcpy vs redpanda-data/redpanda
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.