barry-ran/qtscrcpy vs vesoft-inc/nebula
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, qtscrcpy and nebula both show healthy maintenance signals. qtscrcpy last saw a commit 2 months ago with 15+ active contributors, while nebula last saw a commit 8 months ago with 34+ active contributors. Both use the Apache-2.0 license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
barry-ran/qtscrcpy →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 5w ago
- ✓15 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 47% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
vesoft-inc/nebula →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 7mo ago
- ✓Last commit 7mo ago
- ✓34+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 29% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| qtscrcpy | nebula | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 29,419 | 12,160 |
| Last commit | 2mo ago | 8mo ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 602 | 673 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 5% | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? barry-ran/qtscrcpy · vesoft-inc/nebula
Ask AI about barry-ran/qtscrcpy vs vesoft-inc/nebula
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.