barry-ran/qtscrcpy vs xenia-project/xenia
barry-ran/qtscrcpy shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, qtscrcpy shows healthier maintenance signals than xenia. qtscrcpy rates Healthy overall while xenia rates Mixed. qtscrcpy last saw a commit 2 months ago with 15+ active contributors, while xenia last saw a commit 4 months ago with 10+ active contributors. qtscrcpy is Apache-2.0-licensed while xenia is Other-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
barry-ran/qtscrcpy →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 5w ago
- ✓15 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 47% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
xenia-project/xenia →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
non-standard license (Other); no CI workflows detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 58% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓Last commit 3mo ago
- ✓10 active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| qtscrcpy | xenia | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 29,419 | 9,393 |
| Last commit | 2mo ago | 4mo ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Open issues | 602 | 310 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 5% | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? barry-ran/qtscrcpy · xenia-project/xenia
Ask AI about barry-ran/qtscrcpy vs xenia-project/xenia
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.