basecamp/kamal vs gollum/gollum
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
basecamp/kamal →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 2w ago
- ✓14 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
Show 3 more →Show less
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 80% of recent commits
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
gollum/gollum →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 6mo ago
- ✓16 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 37% of recent commits)
Show 4 more →Show less
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 6mo ago
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| kamal | gollum | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 14,194 | 14,269 |
| Last commit | 16d ago | 5mo ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 143 | 91 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? basecamp/kamal · gollum/gollum
Ask AI about basecamp/kamal vs gollum/gollum
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.