baseflow/photoview vs chrisrm/material-theme-jetbrains
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, photoview and material-theme-jetbrains both show mixed maintenance signals. photoview last saw a commit 4 years ago with 20+ active contributors, while material-theme-jetbrains last saw a commit 4 years ago with 2+ active contributors. photoview is Apache-2.0-licensed while material-theme-jetbrains is Other-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
baseflow/photoview →
Stale — last commit 4y ago
last commit was 4y ago; no tests detected…
no tests detected; no CI workflows detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 4y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 4y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 60% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓20 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days; add a test suite
- →Fork & modify Mixed → Healthy if: add a test suite
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
chrisrm/material-theme-jetbrains →
Stale — last commit 4y ago
non-standard license (Other); last commit was 4y ago…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 4y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 4y ago
- ⚠Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 98% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓2 active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| photoview | material-theme-jetbrains | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 18,837 | 7,757 |
| Last commit | 4y ago | 4y ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Open issues | 229 | 1 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | — |
| Test coverage | 0% | 4% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? baseflow/photoview · chrisrm/material-theme-jetbrains
Ask AI about baseflow/photoview vs chrisrm/material-theme-jetbrains
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.