baseflow/photoview vs h07000223/flycotablayout
baseflow/photoview shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, photoview shows stronger maintenance signals than flycotablayout. photoview rates Mixed overall while flycotablayout rates Concerns. photoview last saw a commit 4 years ago with 20+ active contributors, while flycotablayout last saw a commit 3 years ago with 1+ active contributor. photoview is Apache-2.0-licensed while flycotablayout is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
baseflow/photoview →
Stale — last commit 4y ago
last commit was 4y ago; no tests detected…
no tests detected; no CI workflows detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 4y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 4y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 60% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓20 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days; add a test suite
- →Fork & modify Mixed → Healthy if: add a test suite
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
h07000223/flycotablayout →
Looks unmaintained — solo project with stale commits
last commit was 3y ago; single-maintainer (no co-maintainers visible)…
no tests detected; no CI workflows detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 3y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 3y ago
- ⚠Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
- →Fork & modify Mixed → Healthy if: add a test suite
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| photoview | flycotablayout | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 18,837 | 11,105 |
| Last commit | 4y ago | 3y ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 229 | 370 |
| Has tests | — | — |
| Has CI | — | — |
| Test coverage | 0% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Concerns signals |
Want the full analysis? baseflow/photoview · h07000223/flycotablayout
Ask AI about baseflow/photoview vs h07000223/flycotablayout
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.