baseflow/photoview vs java-decompiler/jd-gui
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, photoview and jd-gui both show mixed maintenance signals. photoview last saw a commit 4 years ago with 20+ active contributors, while jd-gui last saw a commit 2 years ago with 4+ active contributors. photoview is Apache-2.0-licensed while jd-gui is GPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
baseflow/photoview
Stale — last commit 4y ago
last commit was 4y ago; test evidence incomplete…
test evidence incomplete; CI evidence incomplete…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 4y ago; CI evidence incomplete…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 4y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 60% of recent commits
- ✓20 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
java-decompiler/jd-gui
Stale — last commit 2y ago
copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; last commit was 2y ago…
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 2y ago; CI evidence incomplete…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 95% of recent commits
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| photoview | jd-gui | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 18,837 | 15,083 |
| Last commit | 4y ago | 2y ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 229 | 247 |
| Has tests | Unknown | ✓ |
| Has CI | Unknown | Unknown |
| Test coverage | 0% | 5% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? baseflow/photoview · java-decompiler/jd-gui
Ask AI about baseflow/photoview vs java-decompiler/jd-gui
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.