baseflow/photoview vs supertokens/supertokens-core
supertokens/supertokens-core shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, supertokens-core shows healthier maintenance signals than photoview. supertokens-core rates Healthy overall while photoview rates Mixed. photoview last saw a commit 4 years ago with 20+ active contributors, while supertokens-core was committed to 1 week ago with 6+ active contributors. Both use the Apache-2.0 license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
baseflow/photoview
Stale — last commit 4y ago
last commit was 4y ago; test evidence incomplete…
test evidence incomplete; CI evidence incomplete…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 4y ago; CI evidence incomplete…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 4y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 60% of recent commits
- ✓20 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
supertokens/supertokens-core
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 53% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓6 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| photoview | supertokens-core | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 18,837 | 15,295 |
| Last commit | 4y ago | 13d ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 229 | 142 |
| Has tests | Unknown | ✓ |
| Has CI | Unknown | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 92% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | C |
| Cycles | — | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? baseflow/photoview · supertokens/supertokens-core
Ask AI about baseflow/photoview vs supertokens/supertokens-core
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.