bayandin/awesome-awesomeness vs w181496/web-ctf-cheatsheet
w181496/web-ctf-cheatsheet shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, web-ctf-cheatsheet shows stronger maintenance signals than awesome-awesomeness. web-ctf-cheatsheet rates Mixed overall while awesome-awesomeness rates Concerns. awesome-awesomeness last saw a commit 2 years ago with 44+ active contributors, while web-ctf-cheatsheet last saw a commit 8 months ago with 3+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
bayandin/awesome-awesomeness →
Stale and unlicensed — last commit 2y ago
no license — legally unclear; last commit was 2y ago…
no license — can't legally use code; no tests detected
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 2y ago
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓44+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 39% of recent commits)
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
w181496/web-ctf-cheatsheet →
Slowing — last commit 6mo ago
no license — legally unclear; top contributor handles 98% of recent commits…
no license — can't legally use code; no tests detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 6mo ago…
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 6mo ago
- ⚠Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 98% of recent commits
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 6mo ago
- ✓3 active contributors
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| awesome-awesomeness | web-ctf-cheatsheet | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 33,418 | 2,960 |
| Last commit | 2y ago | 8mo ago |
| License | — | — |
| Open issues | 54 | 0 |
| Has tests | — | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | — | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Concerns signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? bayandin/awesome-awesomeness · w181496/web-ctf-cheatsheet
Ask AI about bayandin/awesome-awesomeness vs w181496/web-ctf-cheatsheet
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.