RepoPilot

beego/beego vs foxcpp/maddy

beego/beego shows stronger signals overall

As of June 2026, beego shows healthier maintenance signals than maddy. beego rates Healthy overall while maddy rates Mixed. beego last saw a commit 2 months ago with 36+ active contributors, while maddy last saw a commit 1 month ago with 17+ active contributors. beego is Other-licensed while maddy is GPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

beego/beego

Healthy

Healthy across the board

ConcernsDependency

non-standard license (Other)

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
  • Last commit 4w ago
  • 36+ active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 29% of recent commits)
  • Other licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: clarify license terms

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

foxcpp/maddy

Mixed

Mixed signals — read the receipts

ConcernsDependency

copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 75% of recent commits
  • GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
  • Last commit 1w ago
  • 17 active contributors
  • GPL-3.0 licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

Signal-by-signal breakdown

beegomaddy
Stars32,4045,953
Last commit2mo ago1mo ago
LicenseOtherGPL-3.0
Open issues19128
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage5%18%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineHealthy signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? beego/beego · foxcpp/maddy

Ask AI about beego/beego vs foxcpp/maddy

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.